Inclusive Intervention Proposal

Designing a Responsive Learning Support Ecosystem

Introduction:

Through my work in 1-2-1 Student Support and Digital Communication session, I’ve become more aware of how many barriers go unspoken. Students often don’t ask for help in the session when they are struggling, I noticed this is not because they don’t want to succeed, but because of fear of being ashamed, culturally pressured, or access issues that haven’t been seen.

This intervention idea is about creating a more responsive learning support ecosystem, blending some changes into the existing system that make a big difference.

Phase 1:

I will revisit the 1-2-1 support session booking I created to include questions around leaning preference which are currently lacking (e.g. Visual, Kinaesthetic, auditory or solitary), and environment or access needs, (e.g. ‘I focus better in a quiet space’, or ‘I get anxious in an open space). This questionnaire before booking gives students permission to express how they learn best and helps the specialist technicians adapt their teaching style accordingly and provide suitable learning resources.

Phase 2:

I will also extend this to my Digital Communication teaching (Y1 Fashion Technology: Womenswear) where I have seen many international students struggle silently during live software demonstrations. Some hesitate to speak up, fearing judgement or being misunderstood, a concern especially relevant to culturally diverse group. To support different learning style, religious observance, like Ramadan, and student with disabilities (e.g. Mental health conditions. Currently we only have written Handout available, I’m planning to produce a short, captioned video demos of the software content which can be revisited anytime, creating more flexible, accessible learning options.

This work is guided by the principles of Universal Design for Learning, which encourages educator to offer multiple means of engagement and expression to reduce learning barriers. (CAST 2018). I will also investigate Culturally Sustaining Pedagogies, as the support theory for the framework, which argued “For education to be part of the solution to social injustice, it must centre the rich and varied lives and ways of being, knowing, and communicating of communities that have been and continue to be harmed and marginalised through schooling” (Paris and Alim, 2017, p.2). This approach led us to create teaching practice that affirm student’s cultural identities, not erase or flatten them, especially in globalised classrooms where silence is often misread.

Theory in Practice, Intervention Proposal Theory Informed Intervention Actions, Rebekah Guo, 2025

In conclusion, this intervention is all about moving from ‘accommodations if you ask’ to inclusion by design, building support systems that adapt to students, not the other way around.

Challenges and Limitations:

While this idea aims to be inclusive and responsive, I recognise the limitations, especially the additional labour it may place on already overworked staff. Preparing alternative formats or adapting different teaching styles to suit different learning preferences can become time consuming and, in some cases, feel unrealistic without institutional support or shared resources.

How do we balance individual needs with workload sustainability? I think it would be valuable to research further into the distribution of learning styles and access needs across the cohort to better understand where the highest impact could be made. At the same time, I’m aware of the risk of designing only for the majority, which could create a new exclusion. The challenge is finding a sustainable approach where flexibility is built in by design.

Reference:

CAST (2018) Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. [online] Available at: https://udlguidelines.cast.org/ [Accessed 22 May 2025].

Paris, D. and Alim, H.S. (2017) Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. New York: Teachers College Press. Page 1-3https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Culturally_Sustaining_Pedagogies/3QvGDgAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA1&printsec=frontcover [Accessed 22 May 2025].

One thought on “Inclusive Intervention Proposal”

  1. Dear Rebekah,

    I hope that you are well and appreciate your engagement with formative submission and feedback. The format for this formative feedback is a 300-word maximum summary with 3 questions and or provocations supported by a resource for each item.

    Please find below my feedback, which I hope that you find useful:

    LO1: Critically evaluate institutional, national and global perspectives of equality and diversity in relation to your academic practice context. [Enquiry] –

    The scope of your intervention allows for very useful outcomes whilst considering the institutional nuances of adopting inclusion but not offering remission for the extra time it takes to make inclusive practice a reality. This is an intervention that will create equity for a lot of silent students and offer them a chance to be successful. Well done!

    LO2: Manifest your understanding of practices of inequity, their impact, and the implications for your professional context. [Knowledge] –

    You have shown that you possess a good grasp of inequalities that impact some students who do not want to make a fuss and yet need to do so. My only question is whether you have scope to action this as a test in the next unit?

    LO3: Articulate the development of your positionality and identity through the lens of inclusive practices. [Communication] –

    This intervention is clearly centred in the context of your practice and positionality which is where its strength lies. I also commend you for considering the extent of risks that are institutional. I think you may also find that location of study may play a role in students not feeling comfortable to ask for help.

    LO4: Enact a sustainable transformation that applies intersectional social justice within your practice. [Realisation] –

    A transformational intervention design that I hope you will be able to carry out in the next unit (Action Research) for the benefit of the student population you engage with and beyond.

    Finally, please find some further questions as provocations to support the development of your intervention:

    Does a multimodal approach offer the best option for learning? – Elham Ghobain and Zughaibi, A.A. (2024). ‘Multimodal’ Fits All: Revisiting the Relevance of Perceptual Learning Styles in Higher Education Today. Theory and practice in language studies, 14(4), pp.995–1004.

    Consider definig specific learning styles in your report – Papadatou-Pastou, M., Touloumakos, A.K., Koutouveli, C. and Barrable, A. (2020). The learning styles neuromyth: when the same term means different things to different teachers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36, pp.511–531.

    How effective will your equitable approach become? – Qu, X. and Cross, B. (2024). UDL for inclusive higher education—What makes group work effective for diverse international students in UK? International Journal of Educational Research, 123, pp.102277–102277.

    Regards and take care,

    Kwame Baah

Leave a Reply